Fraud, financial crime and compliance.

Ten guides for fraud, BSA and compliance teams at community banks and credit unions, from check fraud to HMDA.

How AI coworkers work

These guides cover the fraud, financial crime and compliance work of community banks and credit unions. Each explains how a scheme or an obligation works, the rules and deadlines that apply, and where the hours go.

Banks, thrifts and credit unions filed 521,036 check-fraud suspicious activity reports in 2024, more than five times as many as in 2014.⁠[1] This page maps the guides, explains how AI coworkers can take on the gathering, and links the results customers have published.

Guides by topic

How AI coworkers work

Deciding is quick once the picture is complete. Getting the picture is the slow part: the evidence for one flagged check, alert or dispute sits across several systems, each with its own search.

Socratix AI coworkers can take on the gathering, as they already do for check, ACH and HMDA reviews. For every item, they can pull the evidence from each system into one case, compare it with the customer's own history and your policies, and hand your analysts a recommendation with the reasoning laid out. Your team still makes every call. It just stops spending the day assembling the picture.

  1. GatherCan pull the evidence for each check, alert or request, such as account history, transactions, images, due diligence and prior cases, from the systems that hold it, into one case.
  2. AssessCan compare it with the customer's own history, your policies and the patterns for that topic, and watch the clocks.
  3. RecommendCan propose the next step with the evidence, a plain-language reason and, when one is warranted, a draft SAR narrative. Your analyst decides.
  4. LearnCan learn from each decision — your policies, your risk appetite, your analysts' judgment — and log every step for the examiner.

AI recommends. Your analysts decide. Your examiner sees every step.

Results from published case studies

Why community banks and credit unions need help now

The volume keeps rising, and much of compliance behaves like fixed overhead, so it weighs most on the smallest institutions.⁠[5]

  • 204,927 suspicious activity reports flagging ACH fraud were filed by banks, thrifts and credit unions in 2024, more than eight times as many as in 2014.⁠[1]
  • 75% of banks and credit unions saw debit card fraud attempts, the payment type most often targeted, in the Federal Reserve Financial Services' 2026 survey.⁠[6]
  • Almost sevenfold: depository SARs listing elder financial exploitation rose from 15,929 in 2014 to 108,172 in 2024.⁠[1]
  • About $598,700 a year is FinCEN's estimate of what a bank or credit union spends on AML program compliance (size-weighted mean; the median is $414,300), from end-2024 data.⁠[7]
  • 11% to 15.5% of payroll went to compliance at the smallest community banks, against 6% to 10% at the largest, across ten years of surveys by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS), 2015–2024.⁠[5]

A SAR counts a report, not a loss.

Your team can't add analysts as fast as the queue grows. AI coworkers can do the gathering on every item, so the people you have spend their time on the decision, and the same team can review everything instead of a sample.

AI coworkers FAQ

What is an AI coworker for fraud and compliance teams?

An AI coworker is software that takes on the gathering in an investigation. For each check, alert or request, it pulls the evidence from the systems that hold it into one case, assesses it against your policies, and recommends an action with the reasoning laid out. Your analysts make the decision, and every step is logged for the examiner.

How is it different from a fraud model or rules engine?

A rules engine or fraud model flags activity: it raises an alert or a score. An AI coworker works what comes after the flag. It can gather the evidence behind the alert, compare it with the customer's own history and your policies, and explain its recommendation in plain language for an analyst to follow or override.

Does the AI make the decision?

No. AI coworkers recommend and your analysts decide. For a flagged check, the recommendation is pay, return, hold or escalate, with the evidence and a plain-language reason; the analyst can follow or override it, and every step is logged for the examiner. At First Community Bank and Trust, clean checks clear automatically and the rest go to an analyst.⁠[2]

Do examiners accept AI in BSA/AML programs?

Regulators have encouraged it, with governance. In a 2018 joint statement, the federal banking agencies, FinCEN and the NCUA said pilot programs “should not subject banks to supervisory criticism” even if they fail. FinCEN's April 2026 proposed rule, not yet final, says institutions that responsibly experiment won't face added risk of a significant supervisory or enforcement action “solely based on the use of innovative technologies.” Your institution stays responsible for its program, so expect examiners to look at oversight, testing and who makes each decision.⁠[7]⁠[8]

How does it connect to our systems?

Socratix can work with the systems your team already uses; the ones it lists include Jack Henry, Fiserv, Verafin and NICE Actimize. AI coworkers can pull the evidence from those systems into one case, so analysts don't open each one. Which connections your institution needs is scoped with your team.

What does it cost?

It's scoped per institution, so there's no list price. To get a scope for yours, request a demo.

Sources

  1. 1.FinCEN, SAR Stats, Section 2: Depository Institution SARs, Exhibit 5 (data through Dec 31, 2024) · workbook updated Aug 2025
  2. 2.Socratix AI case study, First Community Bank and Trust Reviews 100% of Its Checks for Fraud · Aug 2026
  3. 3.Socratix AI case study, How Super.com Reduced Manual Account Reviews at Scale with Socratix AI · Mar 2026
  4. 4.Socratix AI case study, How AtoB Delivered Instant Credit Decisions with Socratix AI · Jan 2026
  5. 5.Conference of State Bank Supervisors, Too Small to Scale: What 10 Years of Data Say About Community Bank Compliance Costs (CSBS survey years 2015–2024) · Nov 13, 2025
  6. 6.Federal Reserve Financial Services, 2026 Risk Officer Report (403 institutions using FRFS services, fielded Q4 2025, ±6% at 95% confidence; not independent academic research) · 2026
  7. 7.FinCEN, Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Programs, proposed rule, 91 FR 18704 (not final) · Apr 10, 2026
  8. 8.Federal Reserve, FDIC, FinCEN, NCUA and OCC, Joint Statement on Innovative Efforts to Combat Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing · Dec 3, 2018

This guide is general information, not legal advice.

Get started

Ready to see what Socratix can do?

Fraud is dynamic. You need systems that adapt, learn, and act in real time — our agents do more than automate workflows, they make intelligent decisions.